Promotion and Posting , Transfer Orders of IPs of SK Region

Promotion & Postings)

Sl No	Name of the candidate S/S	Division from which qualified.	Posted as	Remarks
1	K.V. Nanjunda Raju, Postal Assistant	Bangalore  East	IP, Nagamangala sub dn.	Against the vacant post
2	M. Manukumar, Postal Assistant	Nanjangud	IP, Sullia sub dn.	Against the vacant post
3	N. Satish, Sorting Assistant	BG Sorting Division	IP, Robertsonpet sub dn.	Against the vacant post
4	J. Mohan, Postal Assistant	Bangalore  East	IP, Chintamani sub dn.	Vice Sri. N. Govindaraju transferred
5	P.L. Nagaraju, Postal Assistant	Tumkur	IP, Gauribidanur sub dn.	Against the vacant post
6	M. Chandra Naik,  Postal Assistant	Puttur	IP, Kunigal sub dn.	Vice Sri. M. Kumaraswamy  transferred (APS candidate)
7	C. Shobha,  Postal Assistant	Mandya	IP, Kollegal sub dn.	Against the vacant post

                

Part –B (Promotion  & allotment to NK Region)

Sl No	Name of the candidate S/S	Division from which qualified.	Posted as	Remarks
1	Nagaraj Postal Assistant	Shimoga Dn.	IP, Athni sub dn.	In the vacant post
2	Gangappa Postal Assistant	Tumkur Dn.	IP, Humnabad sub dn.	In the vacant post
3	K.M. Gajendra, Postal Assistant	Mandya Dn.	IP, Bhalki sub dn.	In the vacant post
4	B. Jayakumar Postal Assistant	Hassan Dn.	IP, Harapanahalli sub dn.	In the vacant post

Part –C (Transfer & postings)

Sl No	Name of the official  S/S	Presently  working as	Posted as	Remarks
1	M. Kumaraswamy (APS Candidate)	designate IP, Kunigal sub dn.	IP, Sira sub dn.	Against the vacant post
2	N. Govindaraju	IP, Chintamani sub dn.	IPO ©, Kolar (At request No TA/TP)	Against the post to be re-deployed  (the post of  IP CBS, SKRO as IPO (C ) Kolar)

Allotment of PSS Gr.B officers of LDCE 2012
To see original memo, please CLICK HERE.

Shri S. Samanth, former officer of the Indian Postal Service, has assumed the office of Interim Secretary General of ad-hoc seretariat of South Asian Postal Union(SAPU) on 25-07-2012

The official address and telephone numbers of officers

MINUTES OF BIMONTHLY MEETING WITH PMG NK REGION DHARWAD ON 11.08.2012

CHQ News:-

CHQ News:-

GS writes to DG(Posts) to convene supplementary DPC before posting of LDCE

No. CHQ/IPASP/DPC/2012                                     Dated :27/8/2012.

To,

Ms Manjula Prashar,

Director General,

Department of Posts,

Dak Bhavan, Sansad Marg,

New Delhi 110 001.

Subject : Request to convene supplementary DPC before posting of LDCE              candidates in PS Group “B”. 

         

Respected Madam,

          IPASP Association while expressing gratitude for starting process to convene regular PS Group “B” DPC for the vacancy year 2012-13, also expresses its concern for not convening supplementary DPC for the left out vacancies of 2011-12.  Non- convening of supplementary DPC is bound to disturb the present 75% quota meant for seniority-cum-fitness promotions of the respective year. To add to the misery, PS Group “B” 2011-12 examination result under 25% quota will mar the legitimate right of the left out 1988 batch Inspector Posts in  their further promotion who are awaiting their elevation for the last 25 years in IP cadre even after giving their prime career to the Department for successful implementation of innovative schemes. Non convening of supplementary DPC will also mean no effect on 23 refusal of promotion accepted by the Directorate.  It is pertinent to mention here that presently 1988 batch IPs are working on adhoc in PS Group “B” and this act of the department will place them as subordinates of their juniors.  

The injustice being met with our senior members who are feeling humiliated, was brought to your kind notice vide Association’s letter dated 7/5/2012 (copy attached) & 25/7/2012 (copy attached) with the request to convene supplementary DPC as is being done every year before promotion through LDCE (25% quota) but this time no action seems to has been taken by the Directorate. Under trying circumstances, Department cannot blame senior members of this Association for any litigation that could arise owing to fixation of seniority for not convening supplementary DPC for the remaining vacancies of the year 2011-12. The supplementary DPC ought to have been convened before the declaration of PS Group “B” LDCE result.

Ambiguities arising in the IP list of the prospective PS Group “B” officers also need to be paid attention before convening DPC for the vacancy year 2012-13. Special attention is required to be bestowed to the non- figured left out prospective candidates like Sh. Parshotam Das, a 1987 batch Inspector Posts (Punjab) and Sh. M.S.Thawale (SC), a 1989 batch Inspector Posts (Maharashtra) beside others. It is pertinent to mention here that despite being eligible they were not considered in the last DPC as well.  

In view of the above, it is once again requested to first convene the supplementary DPC for the left out vacancies of 2011-12 and then hold the regular DPC for the vacancy year 2012-13. The candidates declared successful against 25% quota should only be considered for promotion and posting thereafter.

The Association solicits your lawful support and action. 

With warm regards,

Yours sincerely,

                                                                                                                      Sd/

(Vilas Ingale)

General Secretary

Prescribed Time Limits for filing Appeal/Petition/Complaint  etc., under different Acts/Rules:

Under CCS [CCA] Rules

Actions	Time Limits
For submission of written statement of his defence to the charge sheet	Within 10 days of the receipt of Memorandum [Charge Sheet]
Period of limitation of Appeal	Appeal has to be preferred within a period of 45 days from the date on which a copy of the order appealed against is delivered to the applicant.  However, the Appellate Authority may entertain the appeal after the expiry of that period, if it is satisfied that the appellant had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal in time.
Time limit for disposal of Appeal	Not prescribed, however quicker disposal is insisted by the rules.
Exercising of Revisionary Power by the Appellate Authority	Within six months of the date of the order proposed to be revised. In case, however more than six months have elapsed from the date of the order to be reviewed, the question of recommending a revision by the P&T Board, should be taken up through the respective Heads of Circle and Administrative Officers.
Review of Punishment	Powers vested with the President, can be carried out at any time.
Submission of Revision Petition	An employee may prefer a revision petition to the Revising Authority without submitting an appeal.  If the Revising Authority to whom the revision petition has been preferred is the Appellate Authority, the revision petition should be submitted well before six months of the date of the order sought to be revised.  In so far as a petition for revision to the P&T Board/President is concerned, though CCS [CCA] Rules 1965 do not lay down any time limit, it would be advisable to prefer such petitions within six months of the date of the order sought to be revised.
Review of Suspension	Suspension shall not be valid after 90 days unless it is extended after review before the expiry of 90 days.

Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986:

Actions	Time Limits
For Filing  Complaint in Consumer Forum	The District Forum, the State Commission or the National Commission shall not admit a complaint unless it is filed within 2 years from the date on which the cause of action has arisen.  However, a complaint may be entertained after the period specified above if the complainant satisfies that the District Forum, The State Commission of the National Commission, as the case may be , that he had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint within such period.
Enforcement of the orders of Forum	When the order is not implemented, District Forum, State Commission or National Commission may order the attachment of the property of the person not complying.  However, no attachment shall remain in force for more than three months at the end of which, if the non compliance continues, the property attached may be sold and out of the proceeds thereof, the District Forum of the State Commission or the National Commission may award such damages as it things fit to the complainant and shall pay the balance if any to the party entitled thereto.

Under Central Administrative Tribunal Act:

Actions	Time Limits
Time limit for filing an application before CAT	An application has to be filed within 1 year from the date on which the initial final order has been made.  Where an appeal/representation has been submitted in the matter and the authority competent to pass final order has not passed the said order, application has to be filed after the expiry of a period of six months from the submission such application/representation and within one year from the date of expiry of the said period of six months.  Tribunal has power to admit an application in relaxation of the above limitation, if sufficient cause is shown, supported by an affidavit, for not making the application within the stipulated period.
Action Judgment	The order of the Tribunal is final and binding on both the parties.  It should be compiled with within the time-limit prescribed in the order or within six months of the receipt of the order, if no time-limit is prescribed.  Failure to implement the order in time may give rise to cause of action for initiating contempt proceedings.
Review Provision	If the applicant and/or the respondent are not satisfied with the judgment, it is open to them to seek review of the judgment by filing a petition within 30 days of the communication of the order.  Review petition would lie only when there is a glaring omission, paten mistake or grave error.  Once the review petition is dismissed, there is no provision for further review.  The matter has to be agitated before Hon.Supreme Court, through Special Leave Petition.

 Jurisdiction of District Consumer Forum, State Commission and National Commission:

District Forum	Where the value of goods or services and compensation does not exceed Rs.20 Lakh.
State Commission	Where the value of goods or services and compensation is above Rs.20 Lakh, but below Rs.1 Core.
National Commission	Where the value of goods or services and compensation is above Rs.1 Core

By, 

Shrinath N.B.

Assistant Superintendent [Division]

O/o the Superintendent of Post Offices

Karwar Division

Karwar 581 301

Office Telephone No: 08382-221431

Mobile Nos : 9980762909

                   9449848891

email ID: shrinathbasrur@gmail.com