All India Association of
Inspector Posts and Assistant Superintendent Posts, Karnataka Circle
|
|||
Naveen. Chander
[President]
Assistant Supdt Posts Bantwal Sub Division, Bantwal, Puttur
Division
|
Manjunatha. Hubballi
[Circle Secretary]
Assistant Supdt Posts Haver Sub Division, Haveri-581110
|
Joseph. Rodrigues
[Circle Treasurer]
Assistant Supdt Posts (HQ) o/o SSPO’s Mangalore Division
Mangalore
|
|
No:IP/ASP/1-3/2015 @ Haveri the 08.04.2015
To,
Sri M S Ramanujam IPoS
Chief Postmaster General
Karnataka Circle
Bangalore-560001
Subject: Request to withdraw the memo issued in
connection with RT of IP/ASP –reg
Respected sir,
This is regarding the instructions issued
vide Co letter No STA/7-2/IP/RT dated 26.03.2015.
It is
factual that targets are allotted by Directorate to Circles and in turn Circles
allocate the targets to the Regions and from Regions it is allotted to
Divisions and finally to the Sub Divisions. Now, by practice, it is construed
as the target of the IP/ASP by administration. The IP /ASP being called as the
grass root manager or the cutting edge in the administration made solely
responsible for the performance in the sub divisions.
Through
this letter association is trying to bring to the kind attention of the respected
CPMG sir that the target allotted to the IP/ASPs in the sub division cannot be
achieved by the individual IP/ASP. In
addition to the routine work of the sub division, the IP/ASP can motivate the
sub staff in achieving the targets apart from shortage of staff & vacant
posts. In spite of all the genuine efforts of motivating, marketing, if the
staff down the line cannot co-operate / sow results then why the IP/ASP cadre
alone selectively targeted by the administration by issuing such circulars /
instructions. Whether similar types of instructions are issued to all the
Divisional Heads to assess the performance of the individual staff while
issuing RT. Whether Circle / Regions are following such practices while
considering the requests of the other cadre officials / Officers also? There are instances approving Transfers /
Re-allotment of class III officials by the administration without observing any
parameters.
Respected
sir, Karnataka Postal Circle is leading in all fronts. All the pilot projects
are initiated in Karnataka Circle because of its work culture. We are a head in
all respects as compared to other circles. Any Officer of your rank will not deny
this if they have worked in North India. In Sukanya Samruddi Yojana, the circle
could achieve the target. Does this mean
that this is achieved without any contribution from IP/ASP. I request to
collect and compare the SSY accounts opened in BO v/s SO/HO. It is because of
accounts opened in villages / BOs contributed to the target which shows the
motivation given by IP/ASPs to BO staff. Our CPMG sir will not deny this fact.
But in spite of this issuing such general circulars targeting only IP/ASP’s is
de-motivating the cadre. Rather considering the request of IP/ASPs for
re-allotment and giving their place of choice in transfer will definitely boost
the morale of the cadre and there by the business. After all IP/ASP also having
family and you will appreciate the fact that any normal human being would like
to be with the family or at least near to his family.
Hence
I request you to consider all these factors and withdraw the memo under
reference and consider the request of IP/ASPs for the place of their choice so
that they can show better performance in their place of choice in the ensuing
days.
Thanking you sir,
Yours
sincerely,
Sd/-
(Manjunatha G
Hubballi)
Circle Circle Secretary IP&ASP Karnataka Circle
Circular copy enclosed for reference.
No comments:
Post a Comment